<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mexico’s drug war</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewski.net/2009/04/mexicos-drug-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewski.net/2009/04/mexicos-drug-war/</link>
	<description>Coming soon in three dimensions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:43:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald</title>
		<link>http://andrewski.net/2009/04/mexicos-drug-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewski.net/?p=334#comment-1674</guid>
		<description>I am very much in favour of it being legalised for all the points Rob brought up. Many of the negative connotations we have with marijuana were brought on by government scaremongering (e.g., Reefer Madness, the commercials from the &#039;80s [&#039;I learnt it by watching you, Dad!&#039;]).

The scare tactics have gone so far as to make the growing of hemp illegal in the States due to the fact that marijuana could be grown surreptitiously in a field of hemp, which is bunk.  Either/both of these, while properly regulated, could be a large source of income for the country.  And that doesn&#039;t even touch on the number of people given long prison sentences for low-volume marijuana use.

I am left with the belief that marijuana is the same as alcohol during prohibition, especially since it is far less damaging and addictive than either alcohol or nicotine. There has yet, in my opinion, to be a good reason to keep marijuana as an illicit drug.  That and you don&#039;t smell like an ashtray afterward.

Thankfully it was decriminalised in Oregon in &#039;73 making possession of less than an ounce a Class C. There&#039;s even an initiative making its way to the 2010 ballots for it to be legalised.  It&#039;s not the first and it might not pass, but that&#039;s how we Oregonians roll ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very much in favour of it being legalised for all the points Rob brought up. Many of the negative connotations we have with marijuana were brought on by government scaremongering (e.g., Reefer Madness, the commercials from the ‘80s [’I learnt it by watching you, Dad!’]).</p>
<p>The scare tactics have gone so far as to make the growing of hemp illegal in the States due to the fact that marijuana could be grown surreptitiously in a field of hemp, which is bunk.  Either/both of these, while properly regulated, could be a large source of income for the country.  And that doesn’t even touch on the number of people given long prison sentences for low-volume marijuana use.</p>
<p>I am left with the belief that marijuana is the same as alcohol during prohibition, especially since it is far less damaging and addictive than either alcohol or nicotine. There has yet, in my opinion, to be a good reason to keep marijuana as an illicit drug.  That and you don’t smell like an ashtray afterward.</p>
<p>Thankfully it was decriminalised in Oregon in ’73 making possession of less than an ounce a Class C. There’s even an initiative making its way to the 2010 ballots for it to be legalised.  It’s not the first and it might not pass, but that’s how we Oregonians roll <img src='http://andrewski.net/wp-content/plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-wink.png' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://andrewski.net/2009/04/mexicos-drug-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1671</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewski.net/?p=334#comment-1671</guid>
		<description>&lt;block&gt;&lt;i&gt;It would bring in much needed government revenue through taxation...&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/block&gt;
Absolutely. Which reminds me, I forgot to mention that the money poured into the war on drugs could be reallocated, something else that is quite timely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><block><i>It would bring in much needed government revenue through taxation…</i></block><br />
Absolutely. Which reminds me, I forgot to mention that the money poured into the war on drugs could be reallocated, something else that is quite timely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://andrewski.net/2009/04/mexicos-drug-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1670</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 06:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewski.net/?p=334#comment-1670</guid>
		<description>Totally agree on the legalization of weed.  Why?
- Its a less dangerous drug than alcohol b/c its a stimulant and not a depressant.  While they shouldn&#039;t, people who are high can definitely still drive...  I also personally believe that it is not as &quot;hard&quot; of a drug as alcohol - meaning that its tough to be completely incapacitated by smoking it, whereas folks get &quot;wasted&quot; on alcohol all the time.
- Legalization and regulation would help to put an end to the violence caused by the illegal trade of the drug, just like when prohibition ended in the US ---  Although as a side note its really up for debate how many drug cartels make their money from weed.  I&#039;ve heard that there&#039;s just not that much money in it compared to harder drugs. This is certainly the case in the inner city gangs of the US - its pretty clear that they make all of their money from crack cocaine.  In Mexico where marijuana is grown, it may be more profitable...
- It would bring in much needed government revenue through taxation - especially in CA where our state government is deeply in debt!
- As far as I know, weed is not physically addictive like harder drugs that I am also &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; ambivalent about legalizing. And like alcohol, it can be used &quot;recreationally&quot; without impairment to - as you said - productivity/livelihood/career/family/life.  (Some of the most productive/lively/ambitious/caring/full-of-life people I know smoke pot.)
- I&#039;m a libertarian at heart.  Let the people do what they want as long as its not a force that will be beyond their control and will cause them to hurt themselves / others.  I realize that this is a very fuzzy way to draw the legal/illegal line, but I believe that if the line is &lt;i&gt;already&lt;/i&gt; drawn on the far side of alcohol, its sort of ridiculous that its drawn on this side of weed.
- wow I just wrote a lot ;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree on the legalization of weed.  Why?<br />
– Its a less dangerous drug than alcohol b/c its a stimulant and not a depressant.  While they shouldn’t, people who are high can definitely still drive…  I also personally believe that it is not as “hard” of a drug as alcohol — meaning that its tough to be completely incapacitated by smoking it, whereas folks get “wasted” on alcohol all the time.<br />
– Legalization and regulation would help to put an end to the violence caused by the illegal trade of the drug, just like when prohibition ended in the US —  Although as a side note its really up for debate how many drug cartels make their money from weed.  I’ve heard that there’s just not that much money in it compared to harder drugs. This is certainly the case in the inner city gangs of the US — its pretty clear that they make all of their money from crack cocaine.  In Mexico where marijuana is grown, it may be more profitable…<br />
– It would bring in much needed government revenue through taxation — especially in CA where our state government is deeply in debt!<br />
– As far as I know, weed is not physically addictive like harder drugs that I am also <b>not</b> ambivalent about legalizing. And like alcohol, it can be used “recreationally” without impairment to — as you said — productivity/livelihood/career/family/life.  (Some of the most productive/lively/ambitious/caring/full-of-life people I know smoke pot.)<br />
– I’m a libertarian at heart.  Let the people do what they want as long as its not a force that will be beyond their control and will cause them to hurt themselves / others.  I realize that this is a very fuzzy way to draw the legal/illegal line, but I believe that if the line is <i>already</i> drawn on the far side of alcohol, its sort of ridiculous that its drawn on this side of weed.<br />
– wow I just wrote a lot ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://andrewski.net/2009/04/mexicos-drug-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1658</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewski.net/?p=334#comment-1658</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the correction.

I don&#039;t know that marijuana use would &lt;i&gt;kill&lt;/i&gt; ambition (but it could, I don&#039;t know), and I&#039;m not saying I think it should be made legal, just that I&#039;m ambivalent. 
It&#039;s certainly addictive, and certainly (as evident from the other pictures) not the only drug involved—and I&#039;m &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; ambivalent about cocaine—but there are legal addictions that can be just as destructive; an alcohol problem can destroy your productivity/livelihood/career/family/life too, if you let it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the correction.</p>
<p>I don’t know that marijuana use would <i>kill</i> ambition (but it could, I don’t know), and I’m not saying I think it should be made legal, just that I’m ambivalent.<br />
It’s certainly addictive, and certainly (as evident from the other pictures) not the only drug involved—and I’m <b>not</b> ambivalent about cocaine—but there are legal addictions that can be just as destructive; an alcohol problem can destroy your productivity/livelihood/career/family/life too, if you let it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://andrewski.net/2009/04/mexicos-drug-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1657</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewski.net/?p=334#comment-1657</guid>
		<description>Interesting thoughts, though I wonder just how badly pot does quell ambition, and just how many people really don&#039;t try or use it because it is illegal.  Would we inadvertently kill what little ambition might be left in the next generation of leaders?  With an increasing and overinflated sense of entitlement and self-worth already at unhealthy levels this might be the camel that broke America&#039;s back.  And yes, I could be way too far on the crazy side of things.. just hypothesizing =)

Also, did you mean &quot;legal&quot; referring to your footnote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts, though I wonder just how badly pot does quell ambition, and just how many people really don’t try or use it because it is illegal.  Would we inadvertently kill what little ambition might be left in the next generation of leaders?  With an increasing and overinflated sense of entitlement and self-worth already at unhealthy levels this might be the camel that broke America’s back.  And yes, I could be way too far on the crazy side of things.. just hypothesizing =)</p>
<p>Also, did you mean “legal” referring to your footnote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
