WordPress OpenID plugin: Now providing

I was very pleased to find out today that the Word­Press OpenID plu­gin was updated. Among some gen­eral fixes, the newest ver­sion sup­ports act­ing as an OpenID provider. In other words, I can use my “andrewski​.net” domain to sign in to any OpenID-enabled web­sites, of which there are plenty. I can then man­age my authen­ti­ca­tions within my Word­Press set­tings. All very good stuff.

(One heads-up: the OpenID plu­gin encour­ages you to install the XRDS-Simple plu­gin. The descrip­tion is there, but I missed it.)

My gen­eral goal is to make my domain as use­ful as pos­si­ble, and this is def­i­nitely a big step.

10 Comments

  1. Posted October 2, 2008 at 20:09 | Permalink

    Ya know, i do that already… required two lines of code… is it dif­fer­ent than the openid code?

  2. Posted October 2, 2008 at 23:02 | Permalink

    The OpenID plu­gin works as a general-purpose provider and man­ager, so you can not only sign in with your WordPress/OpenID but can also man­age your autho­riza­tions. Maybe you’ve been able to do that already, but the updated plu­gin is def­i­nitely major (it did not have that func­tion­al­ity before).

  3. Posted October 3, 2008 at 13:00 | Permalink

    I’ve dis­abled the plu­gin for now until I can bet­ter test it. It seems to want to force OpenID ver­i­fi­ca­tion, when what I want is to allow it as a choice.

  4. Posted October 4, 2008 at 18:19 | Permalink

    @Dan: when del­e­gat­ing, the plu­gin allows you to adver­tise any OpenID exten­sions sup­ported by your del­e­gate OpenID, such as SREG, Attribute Exchange, PAPE, etc. Sim­ply using the HTML meta tags does not allow for that. Addi­tion­ally, the plu­gin lets you use Word­Press as your provider, with­out del­e­gat­ing any­where. While I would dis­cour­age that for most peo­ple, there are some who pre­fer it.

    @Andrew: what do you mean about the plu­gin forc­ing OpenID ver­i­fi­ca­tion? There are cer­tain things you can force, such as using OpenID for new account reg­is­tra­tion, but those are all entirely optional.

  5. Posted October 4, 2008 at 19:07 | Permalink

    @Will: Thanks for both of your infor­ma­tive com­ments. Per­haps I have it set up wrong (I tried to “unforce” every­thing), but when some­one who is not logged in tries to leave a com­ment, they are forced to go through OpenID ver­i­fi­ca­tion. (Though, now that I’m test­ing on my test domain, I can’t seem to repro­duce it any­more. Thoughts?

  6. Posted October 4, 2008 at 19:18 | Permalink

    I should also men­tion that I’m assum­ing any prob­lems with the com­ment form are a con­se­quence of my theme, but I just haven’t had the time to test any­thing yet.

  7. Posted October 4, 2008 at 19:43 | Permalink

    Com­menters are only prompted to login via OpenID if the URL that they put in is a valid OpenID. If it’s not, then the com­ment is processed as usual. If you’d rather not over­load the web­site field in this man­ner, you can man­u­ally add a sep­a­rate OpenID input field to your com­ment form.

  8. Posted October 4, 2008 at 20:20 | Permalink

    Actu­ally, I would pre­fer to over­load my web­site field. :) So I’m assum­ing that the OpenID field is look­ing for a cer­tain com­ment div/ID and that my theme’s field isn’t iden­ti­fied cor­rectly? (I checked, and it does work on Kubrick.)

  9. Posted October 4, 2008 at 23:05 | Permalink

    check to make sure your theme is call­ing wp_footer()

  10. Posted October 9, 2008 at 20:38 | Permalink

    My footer.php con­tains “< ?php do_action(‘wp_footer’, ”); ?>”; is that what I should hope to see?

    Where’s the best place to get sup­port for this?

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting

Aether Child Theme by altamente decorativo & bendler.tv | built on Thematic Framework